3.4 Role of parties in promoting access to justice with online dispute resolution 3.4.1 State The State has a role, first, in perfecting the legal framework on ODR and related fields. Second, in building the judicial system, data center, national … Đọc tiếp
3.2 Access to justice, online dispute resolution and e-courts In the context of a digital society, basic human rights, especially the rights of vulnerable groups, are one of the factors that need to be focused on when deploying and applying … Đọc tiếp
In addition to online mediation and arbitration, e-courts have been focused on building and applying in many countries around the world (Australia, Canada, Korea, China, France, Russia, Singapore, etc.) to enhance the effectiveness of the judiciary. To build an e-court, … Đọc tiếp
1. Problem statement Along with the development of e-commerce and dispute resolution technology, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) has also been developed and become one of the methods that parties can use to resolve disputes. The strengths of information technology will … Đọc tiếp
2. Comparison of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms among CPTPP members a. Overview of the availability of ADR mechanisms As analyzed above, CPTPP members recognize the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanism. All CPTPP members have a dispute resolution mechanism through … Đọc tiếp
c. Quality of the Judicial Process The Quality of the Judicial Processes Index is a composite measure of court structure and procedures, case management, automated courts, and alternative dispute resolution. Singapore and Australia jointly lead the way in the quality … Đọc tiếp
